AOER.AS


  • URI

    http://purl.org/ASN/scheme/AOER/AS

  • type

    http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#Concept

  • notation

    en-US AOER.AS

  • definition

    en-US Rubric IV: Quality of Assessments

  • title

    Rubric IV: Quality of Assessments

  • description

    This rubric is applied to those objects designed to determine what a student knows before, during, or after a topic is taught. When many assessment items are included in one object, as is often the case, the rubric is applied to the entire set.

    Rubric IV Scoring Guide

    Score Definition / Criteria
    3: An object is rated superior for the quality of its assessments only if all of the following are true:
    • All of the skills and knowledge assessed align clearly to the content and performance expectations intended, as stated or implied in the object.
    • Nothing is assessed that is not included in the scope of intended material unless it is differentiated as extension material.
    • The most important aspects of the expectations are targeted and are given appropriate weight/attention in the assessment.
    • The assessment modes used in the object, such as selected response, long and short constructed response, or group work require the student to demonstrate proficiency in the intended concept/skill.
    • The level of difficulty is a result of the complexity of the subject-area content and performance expectations and of the degree of cognitive demand, rather than a result of unrelated issues (e.g. overly complex vocabulary used in math word problems).
    2: An object is rated strong for the quality of its assessments if it assesses all of the content and performance expectations intended, but the assessment modes used do not consistently offer the student opportunities to demonstrate proficiency in the intended concept/skill.
    1: An object is rated limited for the quality of its assessments if it assesses some of the content or performance expectations intended, as stated or implicit in the object, but omits some important content or performance expectations and/or fails to offer the student opportunities to demonstrate proficiency in the intended content/skills.
    0: An object is rated very weak or no value for the quality of its assessments if its assessments contain significant errors, do not assess important content/skills, are written in a way that is confusing to students, or are unsound for other reasons.
    N/A This rubric is not applicable (N/A) for an object that is not designed to have an assessment component. Even if one might imagine ways an object could be used for assessment purposes, if it is not the intended purpose, not applicable is the appropriate score.

  • is top concept in scheme

    http://purl.org/ASN/scheme/AOER/