en-US AOER.DA
en-US Rubric I: Degree of Alignment to Standards
Rubric I: Degree of Alignment to Standards
This rubric is applied to learning objects that have suggested alignments to standards. It is used to rate the degree to which an individual object actually aligns to each proposed standard. The rubric was designed specifically for the Common Core State Standards, but can be used with any set of standards. Before the rubric can be applied, the assumption is that a user has proposed an alignment between the object and the selected standard(s).
There are two major aspects of standards that are vital to a meaningful alignment review: content and performance expectations. It is important that the content addressed in the object matches the content addressed in each proposed standard. Evaluating the alignment of the performances required in both the object and the standard is equally essential and should be considered along with the content.
Rubric I Scoring Guide
Score | Definition / Criteria |
---|---|
3: |
An object has superior alignment only if
both of the following are true:
|
2: |
An object has strong alignment for either
one of two reasons:
|
1: | An object has limited alignment if a significant part of the content or performance expectations of the identified standard is not addressed in the object, as long as there is fidelity to the part it does cover. For example, an object that aligns to CCSS 2.NBT.2, "Count within 1000; skip-count by 5s, 10s, and 100s," but only addresses counting numbers to 500, would be considered to have limited alignment. The object aligns very closely with a limited part of the standard. |
0: |
An object has very weak alignment for either
one of two reasons:
|
N/A | This rubric does not apply for an object that has no suggested standards for alignment. For example, the rubric might not be applicable to a set of raw data. |