@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref14496,
author = {Duur Kornelis Aanen and Thomas W. Kuyper and Ted H.M. Mes and Rolf F. Hoekstra},
title = {The evolution of reproductive isolation in the ectomycorrhizal Hebeloma crustuliniforme aggregate (Basidiomycetes) in northwestern Europe: A phylogenetic approach.},
year = {2000},
keywords = {Basidiomycetes; ectomycorrhiza; Hebeloma crustuliniforme; reproductive isolation; sexual intercompatibility; speciation},
doi = {10.1554/0014-3820(2000)054[1192:TEORII]2.0.CO;2},
url = {},
pmid = {11005288},
journal = {Evolution},
volume = {54},
number = {4},
pages = {1192--1206},
abstract = {To reconstruct the evolution of reproductive isolation in the ectomycorrhizal Hebeloma crustuliniforme
aggregate (Basidiomycetes), phylogenetic relationships were determined between strains that belong to a clade consisting of nine intercompatibility groups (ICGs, biological species). Four of these nine ICGs are partially compatible and belong to the H. crustuliniforme aggregate. Different levels of partial compatibility have been found between these four ICGs. Between ICGs 3 and 4, 15% of the combinations were compatible. One strain was compatible with all isolates of both ICGs 3 and 4 and also with one isolate of ICG 2. Both a nuclear phylogeny, based on ribosomal IGS sequence data, and a mitochondrial phylogeny, based on a group-I intron located in the large subunit ribosomal RNA gene (LrRNA), were reconstructed. The level of incompatibility was compared with the phylogenetic history of individuals belonging to this clade.
Different relationships were found between the level of compatibility and the relative age of the most recent common ancestor (MRCA) for different ICGs. On the one hand, the evolution of incompatibility between ICGs 2 and 3/4 is most consistent with the class of ??divergence- first?? models because a positive correlation was found between the relative age of the MRCA and the level of incompatibility for ICG 2 versus 3/4. On the other hand, the lack of such a correlation for ICGs 3 and 4 shows that (partial) incompatibility between these ICGs has arisen without strong divergence. The ecological (and to a lesser extent geographical) differences found between ICGs 3 and 4 suggest that selection for incompatibility, associated with host tree preference, has been important in the evolution of incompatibility
between these two ICGs. The incongruence between the nuclear and mitochondrial trees for ICG 1 could be explained by a hybrid origin of this ICG, with different donors of the mitochondrial and nuclear sequences.}
}
Matrix 2643 of Study 694
Citation title:
"The evolution of reproductive isolation in the ectomycorrhizal Hebeloma crustuliniforme aggregate (Basidiomycetes) in northwestern Europe: A phylogenetic approach.".
This study was previously identified under the legacy study ID S534
(Status: Published).
Matrices
Title: IGS
Description: Legacy TreeBASE Matrix ID = M781
Download all Row Segment Metadata
Rows
Taxon Label |
Row Segments |
Characters 1?–30 |
Hebeloma helodes ICG 20 strain 688 |
View
|
------------------------------ |
Hebeloma lutense ICG 14 strain 566 |
View
|
------------------------------ |
Hebeloma helodes ICG 9 strain 538 |
View
|
------------------------------ |
Hebeloma crustuliniforme ICG 3 strain 699 |
View
|
G0T0G11G01G0G0GT01010TTGT1T1GG |
Hebeloma crustuliniforme ICG 3 strain 686 |
View
|
G0T0G11G01G0G0GT01010TTGT1T1GG |
Hebeloma crustuliniforme ICG 3 strain 679 |
View
|
G0T0G11G01G0G0GT01010TTGT1T1GG |
Hebeloma crustuliniforme ICG 3 strain 680 |
View
|
G0T0G11G01G0G0GT01010TTGT1T1GG |
Hebeloma crustuliniforme ICG 1 strain 673 |
View
|
G0T0G11G01G0G0GT01010TTGT1T1GG |
Hebeloma crustuliniforme ICG 2 strain 627 |
View
|
G0T0G11G01G0G0GT01010TTGT1T1GG |
Hebeloma crustuliniforme ICG 2 strain 626 |
View
|
G0T0G11G01G0G0GT01010TTGT1T1GG |
Hebeloma crustuliniforme ICG 2 strain 620 |
View
|
G0T0G11G01G0G0GT01010TTGT1T1GG |
Hebeloma crustuliniforme ICG 1 strain 618 |
View
|
G0T0G11G01G0G0GT01010TTGT1T1GG |
Hebeloma crustuliniforme ICG 4 strain 617 |
View
|
G0T0G11G01G0G0GT01010TTGT1T1GG |
Hebeloma crustuliniforme ICG 1 strain 621 |
View
|
G0T0G11G01G0G0GT01010TTGT1T1GG |
Hebeloma crustuliniforme ICG 4 strain 605 |
View
|
G0T0G11G01G0G0GT01010TTGT1T1GG |
Hebeloma crustuliniforme ICG 4 strain 602 |
View
|
G0T0G11G01G0G0GT01010TTGT1T1GG |
Hebeloma crustuliniforme ICG 2 strain 671 |
View
|
G0T0G11G01G0G0GT01010TTGT1T1GG |
Hebeloma crustuliniforme ICG 2 strain 570 |
View
|
G0T0G11G01G0G0GT01010TTGT1T1GG |
Hebeloma crustuliniforme ICG 3 strain 511 |
View
|
G0T0G11G01G0G0GT01010TTGT1T1GG |
Hebeloma crustuliniforme ICG 1 strain 503 |
View
|
G0T0G11G01G0G0GT01010TTGT1T1GG |
Columns
None of the columns has a description.